582
765
Medical Problems have cause i cannot be more active
|
Post by xmultivision - Semi-Active on Oct 15, 2017 16:43:51 GMT 1
If this ever comeback please tag me im very interested in this If this ever comes back, it should be with a host, who isnt rigging the game. Wait, What Happened?
|
|
1,942
5,805
Our first caress
|
Post by Mordecai on Oct 15, 2017 19:33:07 GMT 1
If this ever comeback please tag me im very interested in this If this ever comes back, it should be with a host, who isnt rigging the game. It has come to my attention that you are still bitter over a victory in this game. Please do not badmouth this game because you were not happy with the outcome and point the finger at someone else. 1): Don't blame your shit social game on a rigged host 2): Don't accuse me of rigging the game because Llemian was sent home in a twist THAT HE BROUGHT UPON HIMSELF. Let it be known he had failed to follow the rules and thus was given strikes; enough strikes that he should have been pulled from the game, but I didn't want to disqualify him so late into the game and gave him a second chance by instead giving him a penalty. If you have any more problems with this game, tell me in PM, I don't need you making false accusations fuelled by your emotion because things didn't go your way. You look like an idiot for it.
|
|
|
Post by Kenajabam on Oct 15, 2017 20:49:45 GMT 1
If this ever comes back, it should be with a host, who isnt rigging the game. It has come to my attention that you are still bitter over a victory in this game. Please do not badmouth this game because you were not happy with the outcome and point the finger at someone else. 1): Don't blame your shit social game on a rigged host 2): Don't accuse me of rigging the game because Llemian was sent home in a twist THAT HE BROUGHT UPON HIMSELF. Let it be known he had failed to follow the rules and thus was given strikes; enough strikes that he should have been pulled from the game, but I didn't want to disqualify him so late into the game and gave him a second chance by instead giving him a penalty. If you have any more problems with this game, tell me in PM, I don't need you making false accusations fuelled by your emotion because things didn't go your way. You look like an idiot for it. First, I am not badmouthing the game, it was a nice idea. I am badmouthing you as a host. Thats why I did not directly talk about that earlier, because I would just look like a terrible loser. Also I am not going to deny that I was a bit bitter about losing, but I am over that. Alex played a great game and deserved to win. I didnt play as good as he. What I am not over though is being treated unfairly. And thank you for just basically admitting that this twist was just designed to get Llemian out! Pulling him from the game would at least have been a bit understandable. Though it was you, who never specified time zones and he did sent hours, before you even posted anything, if I remember correctly. But what you did was designing a twist and changing rules to get him out, which was unethical and deceitful and I dont tolerate that. You gave Llemian this penalty, which conveniently put him in third place, but you did not stop there. You changed the tiebreaker rule precisely to get Llemian out. You told me that the person with the smallest score would go, but you wouldnt have got him out this way, so you changed it to a jury vote. I am not fuelled by any emotions anymore. It is just, what I still think. Imo you were no fair host. And if Im looking like an idiot so be it, thats my opinion and I dont want to remain silent.
|
|
1,942
5,805
Our first caress
|
Post by Mordecai on Oct 16, 2017 4:25:58 GMT 1
And thank you for just basically admitting that this twist was just designed to get Llemian out! Pulling him from the game would at least have been a bit understandable. Your logic is flawed. If I wanted Llemian out of the game so badly, why didn't I just pull him out if I had a completely valid reason to do so? Because I would have felt bad for taking him out of the game just like that. So I gave him a chance at the expense of receiving a penalty, which in my opinion is more than fair. And your accusation of me designing a twist to get out Llemian: Before I announce the winner, Llemian submitted his challenge answers after the deadline so as a punishment, he will forfeit his chance at winning individual immunity as well as receive a strike. As this would be his second strike that would remove him from the game, with only five people left and two having quit already I am not going to pull Llemian from the game. However, as additional punishments, Llemian will receive a disadvantage at the remaining challenges (should he still be here).
I posted that on Day 35. If he read the post properly he would have known he would be penalised in further challenges. Though it was you, who never specified time zones You will have 24 hours to complete the challenge. Submit your score via Forum PM by 1:45am CET, Monday 17 April. Unless you have made an arrangement with me prior, remember to screenshot your entire computer screen with the date and time, as well as your score.
Posted Day 2 Submit your Freerice score via FORUM PM by Monday 22 May at midday CET. Special attention to Llemian - CET.
...and posted at the FIC on Day 37, even with special recognition for Llemian. I know he had issues with not understanding the timezone in which the deadline was set by, however I asked other players to see if it was a fault of my own and they understood the timezone being used. I live in New Zealand; if I wanted to be a bitch and make life easier for myself I could've made the timezone NZST. Plus, this forum uses CET as its timezone. If several players had had the same issue then I would acknowledge that I was at fault, but when I have clearly stated CET as the respective timezone each challenge, I am not going to take the blame for someone else's inability to follow instructions. But what you did was designing a twist and changing rules to get him out, which was unethical and deceitful and I dont tolerate that. You gave Llemian this penalty, which conveniently put him in third place, but you did not stop there. You changed the tiebreaker rule precisely to get Llemian out. You told me that the person with the smallest score would go, but you wouldnt have got him out this way, so you changed it to a jury vote. Excuse me? When the challenge was posted, I did not state any stipulation as to what would happen if a tiebreak occurred. That was the whole point of the twist - to force the two safe players to make a fast decision together or risk having their fate controlled by the jury. There were significant time constraints in trying to get the game finished in 39 days, which was common knowledge in the OVSC chat, which is backed up by the fact that the FIC was split into two different stages instead of just a F4 immunity challenge as per normal in a F2 game. Which takes me back to my original argument that if I wanted to remove Llemian so badly from the game as you accuse me of doing, I would have just saved myself the goddamn trouble of trying to rig a challenge to get him out, thus provoking pointless arguments from people like you and just pulled him from the game when he didn't submit his score on time. Honestly, you need to get your head out of your ass as accusing me of rigging a game I devoted over a month's work towards is very disrespectful. If I wanted to rig this game so badly, I would have cast my friends on this forum alongside a whole bunch of people who have no idea how Survivor is played so they could win easily. But I didn't, instead casting people like you, who are fans of the show and gave you the opportunity to play. This is my last response to your very biased and opinionated accusations, which are backed up by no evidence whatsoever. Have a nice day. xmultivision - Semi-Active I hope this issue hasn't stopped you from wanting to play the game, I will remember to tag you when the next season's applications are up
|
|
Tufkai
6 points
he/it
5,998
12,013
There's something in the atmosphere
|
Post by Tufkai on Oct 16, 2017 11:40:51 GMT 1
^This board should be called Forum Total Drama
|
|
|
Post by Kenajabam on Oct 16, 2017 14:59:13 GMT 1
Excuse me? When the challenge was posted, I did not state any stipulation as to what would happen if a tiebreak occurred. That was the whole point of the twist - to force the two safe players to make a fast decision together or risk having their fate controlled by the jury.This is a lie though. When I asked you, what would happen in the case of a tie, you told me something different. And that is why this can not be true, because you have decided some time after you posted the challenge that you would use this tiebreaker method. Making it impossible that this was the whole point of the twist.
|
|