Cedric
4 points
He/Him
1,689
2,933
Jag behöver inte dig idag
|
Post by Cedric on Jan 30, 2018 15:47:20 GMT 1
I didn't know I needed this in my life.
|
|
Aglan
5 points
He/Him
2,760
5,862
More Fighting
|
Post by Aglan on Jan 30, 2018 16:52:13 GMT 1
I have set my alarm clock!
|
|
|
Post by Julian on Feb 12, 2018 17:49:47 GMT 1
POLL: How do you want the semi finals to work?
Option A: All 4 semi finals will be published on the same day (e.g. Monday, 19th February) and all will have the same deadline as well. The results would most likely be presented on the weekend of the same week (e.g. 24th or 25th)
Option B: Semi Final 1 will be published on Monday, SF2 on Tuesday, SF3 on Wednesday and SF4 on Thursday. The deadlines would be 3 days later for each semi final (Wednesday for SF1, Thursday for SF2 and so on)
Please vote in the poll!
|
|
|
Post by Julian on Feb 12, 2018 21:03:13 GMT 1
Option A won, all semi finals will be published on Monday (19th February) next week!
|
|
Aless
Retired Administrator
he/him
10,258
27,553
funk generation
|
Post by Aless on Apr 7, 2018 20:31:35 GMT 1
POLL: How do you want the televoting to work? This change is wanted to be made because of how close the televoting results were. Our aim is to have a televoting in which there is a difference between the votes not as this edition, in which there was a 18 points difference between the first and the last one.
Option A: Keep it as it is. They rank each entry from 1 (dislike) to 10 (love). This would mean that the televoting could still be as close as before.
Option B: Use the current method with higher numbers, for example 1 (dislike) to 100.000 (love). This could mean that even though the televoting could be that close, it's pretty impossible for two entries to receive the same amount of votes and there's a higher chance for there to be a higher difference between them.
Option C: Use the same voting method as the jurors: one set of 12, 10 and 8-1 to their top 10. This could also help to get higher differences, since players wouldn't be able to give the songs the same amount of votes.
Option D: Giving 10, 8, 6, 4 and 2 to their top 5 and 0 to the rest. This could mean that, since a lot of 0 points would be given and only five out of twelve entries would be voted, a huge difference could be marked by this system.
Option E: The NQs will be giving a number of points (could be 20, 50, 100, etc... which would be chosen afterwards) This way, it would be like Option D but the difference would be that the NQs would have the freedom to spread their votes to as many entries as they like.
To vote for this option, vote in the post below!
|
|
Aless
Retired Administrator
he/him
10,258
27,553
funk generation
|
Post by Aless on Apr 7, 2018 20:50:41 GMT 1
Option E: The NQs will be giving a number of points (could be 20, 50, 100, etc... which would be chosen afterwards) This way, it would be like Option D but the difference would be that the NQs would have the freedom to spread their votes to as many entries as they like.
To vote for this option, like this post.
|
|
3,523
9,326
ali mi ne možeš pratit'
|
Post by Dominykas on Apr 7, 2018 20:53:03 GMT 1
Ok, so this might seem a little bit crazy, but still here is my suggestion: As 12 finalists spread 696 points (58*12), that means that 16 non-qualifiers would give the same amount of points - 696. 696/16=43,5, so Second Chance non qualifiers and 5th placers in the Heats would have 44 points and the rest non qualifiers - 43 points. Then, after having those points, participants are free to spread their votes. To make it clear, maximum amount, player can give would be 25 points (just an example, it could be 20, 15...) and the player would spread his points to as much countries as he want So, for example, if maximum amount you can give is 25 and you failed at Second Chance (which makes you having 44 points there) your votes would be able to look like: 25 Country A XX Country B ... Of course, you would be able not to use maximum amount, but I think it would be great to have it, in case of cheating and giving all the points to one country, which is not very realistic. Ofc, this is probably not a great example, but still, that's what I think
|
|
Aless
Retired Administrator
he/him
10,258
27,553
funk generation
|
Post by Aless on Apr 7, 2018 20:54:49 GMT 1
Ok, so this might seem a little bit crazy, but still here is my suggestion: As 12 finalists spread 696 points (58*12), that means that 16 non-qualifiers would give the same amount of points - 696. 696/16=43,5, so Second Chance non qualifiers and 5th placers in the Heats would have 44 points and the rest non qualifiers - 43 points. Then, after having those points, participants are free to spread their votes. To make it clear, maximum amount, player can give would be 25 points (just an example, it could be 20, 15...) and the player would spread his points to as much countries as he want So, for example, if maximum amount you can give is 25 and you failed at Second Chance (which makes you having 44 points there) your votes would be able to look like: 25 Country A XX Country B ... Of course, you would be able not to use maximum amount, but I think it would be great to have it, in case of cheating and giving all the points to one country, which is not very realistic. Ofc, this is probably not a great example, but still, that's what I think But there will be 20 non-qualifiers since we're extending the number of participants.
|
|
3,523
9,326
ali mi ne možeš pratit'
|
Post by Dominykas on Apr 7, 2018 20:56:01 GMT 1
Ok, so this might seem a little bit crazy, but still here is my suggestion: As 12 finalists spread 696 points (58*12), that means that 16 non-qualifiers would give the same amount of points - 696. 696/16=43,5, so Second Chance non qualifiers and 5th placers in the Heats would have 44 points and the rest non qualifiers - 43 points. Then, after having those points, participants are free to spread their votes. To make it clear, maximum amount, player can give would be 25 points (just an example, it could be 20, 15...) and the player would spread his points to as much countries as he want So, for example, if maximum amount you can give is 25 and you failed at Second Chance (which makes you having 44 points there) your votes would be able to look like: 25 Country A XX Country B ... Of course, you would be able not to use maximum amount, but I think it would be great to have it, in case of cheating and giving all the points to one country, which is not very realistic. Ofc, this is probably not a great example, but still, that's what I think But there will be 20 non-qualifiers since we're extending the number of participants. eh then My Idea
|
|
3,628
10,070
The end is near
|
Post by Matilda on Apr 7, 2018 23:06:33 GMT 1
Just remove the app voting if the results are too close
|
|