|
Post by MG on Jul 28, 2015 21:12:17 GMT 1
Isn't it a bit unfair having 15/20/20 participants but the same amount of qualifiers? [2] Nobody cares about our opinions anyway
|
|
|
Post by fabbi on Jul 28, 2015 21:14:45 GMT 1
Nobody cares about our opinions anyway Jeffry is offline at the moment.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Jul 28, 2015 21:23:09 GMT 1
Nobody cares about our opinions anyway Jeffry is offline at the moment. he saw this in facebook chat but ignored it as always
|
|
|
Post by ✨💃 on Jul 28, 2015 21:23:52 GMT 1
Isn't it a bit unfair having 15/20/20 participants but the same amount of qualifiers? [2] [3]
|
|
𝐌𝐈𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐋
4 points
he/him
1,971
5,469
la vita è bella
|
Post by 𝐌𝐈𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐋 on Jul 28, 2015 21:27:27 GMT 1
flagengeos #09
|
|
|
Post by fabbi on Jul 28, 2015 21:35:58 GMT 1
Jeffry is offline at the moment. he saw this in facebook chat but ignored it as always as always?
|
|
1,629
1,940
LOVING YOU IS A LOSING GAME
|
Post by Jericho (Super inactive) on Jul 28, 2015 22:21:11 GMT 1
SF3 19th
|
|
Aless
Retired Administrator
he/him
10,258
27,553
funk generation
|
Post by Aless on Jul 28, 2015 22:51:17 GMT 1
Why not instead of 15, 20 and 20: 18, 18 and 19?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2015 23:20:05 GMT 1
It's been explained already as said in the format thread
|
|
Aless
Retired Administrator
he/him
10,258
27,553
funk generation
|
Post by Aless on Jul 29, 2015 1:32:30 GMT 1
I can't find an explanation.
|
|