|
Post by Julian on Jul 29, 2015 1:36:20 GMT 1
Imo the explanation is stupid, older countries shouldn't get rewarded for being old. And I'm saying this although I'd probably be in the SF with 15 countries if I wasn't AQed
|
|
1,942
5,805
Our first caress
|
Post by Mordecai on Jul 29, 2015 5:27:09 GMT 1
If this mechanism happened in ESC then I'm pretty sure we'd see Luxembourg and Monaco back in the competition Not bashing the idea, but it is quite strange.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2015 9:53:01 GMT 1
Those who still have questions and who've received an answer: Shut it, I've had it with you (in this contest, not personally)
The staff of LYSC:
Dylan, Jani, Laura, Blandine, Daniel, Christian, Matt, Luiri, Callum, Florian & Torbjorn should receive more praise for their work, as they brought the competition to a whole new level., I don't care what you think of me.
People have decided in a democracy what they'd like to see, and we've answered it completely. The alterations came from suggestions from people, and was subsequently voted on, except one tiny thing.
We've answered all your questions, and you were able to read the answers from other people or staff, if not being able to find it yourself.
To Mimis & Florian from WWWSC, if ever reading this: I know exactly what you feel like right now.
If you still really feel that it is bad, weird, strange whatever, and still complain about what most, not all people have decided, via suggestions, votes and polls, beyond this little thing, go to the link below:
ovsc.proboards.com/thread/15317/lysc-29-pre-confirmations?page=6 and withdraw from LYSC, either for edition 29 (even 28) or forever from this competition.
|
|
|
Post by ✨💃 on Jul 29, 2015 10:16:18 GMT 1
I don't want to withdraw, but I think 6 AQs should vote in SF1, 3 in SF2 & 3 in SF3.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Jul 29, 2015 10:17:17 GMT 1
i still can't get why there should be less participants in first semi-final than in other 2 It's totally unfair that some people are getting advantage just because they found about this contest before and joined it before others sorry but if this system will continue i am going to withdraw forever, because it's not just me who thinks it's unfair.
|
|
|
Post by MG on Jul 29, 2015 10:21:45 GMT 1
IMO, if you really want to keep so bad this system, then 2 or 3 oldest countries from SF2 should be moved in SF1, same with countries from SF3... So there would be at least equality in semi-final draw. But of course nobody cares about my opinion because I just joined this contest one week after Neptune and now Neptune is more important for contest than me, and should get more advantage and be in other semi-final because someone found this contest faster? (nothing personal, Max, just an example) I still think it should all be randomly 18/18/19 or 18/19/18 or 19/18/18 or whatever..
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2015 10:24:34 GMT 1
MG this is the last time I'll say it: IT IS FOR 1 EDITION 1!
|
|
|
Post by MG on Jul 29, 2015 10:28:00 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2015 10:31:49 GMT 1
Are you serious about your comment? Then please withdraw, cause I can't stand it anymore.
|
|
|
Post by ✨💃 on Jul 29, 2015 10:38:40 GMT 1
MG this is the last time I'll say it: IT IS FOR 1 EDITION 1! if it is for 1 edition, then ok
|
|