4,128
5,071
Latvia HoD in WWWSC& Retro WWWSC.
|
Post by Shovkovskyi/Peter on Oct 7, 2018 22:49:36 GMT 1
^ This could possibly mean every pair is "stuck" with option A in the end. I know it can happen, but on the other hand, so far there have been only 3 people who've said they'd like option B better (but maybe you know someone else who has said he/she'd like it as well?), which means (if it stays at 3 people) it wouldn't be too much of an issue to lose 1 potential "Option B" pair (more of a tringle of 3 people though). I don't know... maybe you see it differently, but this is how I see it from the information that I have available of others priorities...
|
|
|
Post by Laurinda on Oct 7, 2018 23:14:45 GMT 1
^ This could possibly mean every pair is "stuck" with option A in the end. I know it can happen, but on the other hand, so far there have been only 3 people who've said they'd like option B better (but maybe you know someone else who has said he/she'd like it as well?), which means (if it stays at 3 people) it wouldn't be too much of an issue to lose 1 potential "Option B" pair (more of a tringle of 3 people though). I don't know... maybe you see it differently, but this is how I see it from the information that I have available of others priorities... Now you're making it sound like, me trying to appease the minority (by creating the option B) is pointless. At this point, there could be 2 pairs, but confirmations have not started, so I don't know how many "dare" to do it.
|
|
|
Post by ferrygraf on Oct 7, 2018 23:28:45 GMT 1
I think the original concept is still the easiest one to manage, if people just decide beforehand which option they want to choose Then those countries who are willing to take the challenge are paired together, and the ones who just want Option A are paired together, and that's it. Everyone will know what to do and what to expect then.
|
|
4,128
5,071
Latvia HoD in WWWSC& Retro WWWSC.
|
Post by Shovkovskyi/Peter on Oct 8, 2018 7:57:59 GMT 1
I know it can happen, but on the other hand, so far there have been only 3 people who've said they'd like option B better (but maybe you know someone else who has said he/she'd like it as well?), which means (if it stays at 3 people) it wouldn't be too much of an issue to lose 1 potential "Option B" pair (more of a tringle of 3 people though). I don't know... maybe you see it differently, but this is how I see it from the information that I have available of others priorities... Now you're making it sound like, me trying to appease the minority (by creating the option B) is pointless. At this point, there could be 2 pairs, but confirmations have not started, so I don't know how many "dare" to do it. None of my comments here have been meant to sound disrespectful or taunt to your work as a host (I'm sorry, if you feel that way! ). Those are just my thoughts and ideas, but I haven't said that they definitely need to be taken as the only truth... only as an idea... I know my emotions sometimes take over (especially my first comment), but that doesn't mean yours should too P.S. This is all from me - I won't post anymore ideas/thoughts, because someone might take them the wrong way (as it happens more than rare and not only here in forums).
|
|
1,192
1,432
IG @daeng.jonno
|
Post by superjonno on Oct 10, 2018 8:33:24 GMT 1
Absolutely option A
|
|